Archive for July, 2006

This is Abso-Freakin’ Tastic

So, Lindsay Lohan. Mmmm.

She recieved a letter from the CEO of the production company on the current picture she is working on. Apparently, she’s pretty much the diva in training.

The letter bares spreading. It is really the coolest thing I’ve seen to date. Click here to check out the letter. You know. Acting is still a job. It requires professionalism and a commitment to the business. I don’t know. The letter was just so cool it really needed spreading.

2 Comments

Here’s the Deal

I realize that the following comment(s) can get me in trouble and can, possibly, cause me some headaches. I don’t care. Remember those three words as you read the rest of what I have to write. I – DON’T – CARE!

Tom Cruise and Katie Holmes had a child. The child was born in Tom Cruise’s home away from the glare of flash bulbs and cameras. Who knows why this is the case. Tom might say it’s because of his religious convictions. Whatever. I don’t really care. Katie Holmes was raised Catholic, she is now… probably whatever Tom Cruise is – scientologist, and the outcome is that Tom purchased a lot of equipment so that the baby could be born in his home.

No one, press wise, has seen Suri Cruise. Several actors going into, and out of, the Cruise household have announced that they’ve seen the child. They all say that the child is beautiful.

Here’s where I can get into trouble. Who cares? Who really cares? How many people, on the planet, look at a baby and think, “Wow! That kid is really ugly. How do I stand here and lie to its parents about how attractive it is when in reality… wow! The child is ugly.” No one. Oh, sure, someone may think, “Kid ugly,” but they will always tell the proud parents how beautiful the child is.

Stop that.

What’s more. I think that the alleged Suri Cruise is just that, alleged. That, and this whole media affair with the baby and actors coming and going from that house is more along the lines of the traditional Godfather role being played out than about Tom and Katie actually having something to show off. Maybe this is about control and Tom Cruise is trying to prove that he is the big man on campus, or in Hollywood, or anywhere else. Maybe what is really happening is that there is no kid and everyone that goes into the compound goes in knowing that when they come out (after paying Tommy-boy for the privilege) they are going to tell the press how gorgeous the baby is. Yeah. Who cares?

Babies are little people. They can be ugly. Stop claiming that every child is attractive. That is unattractive.

1 Comment

TV as Entertainment

I could sit here and lie to you, tell you that I believe that television is bad. That watching television erodes the mind and destroys a person’s cognitive sense of self and well-being, and that it destroys lives. I do believe that TV help cause children, who remain unmonitored, to become fat and lazy and I believe that video games and the internet have the ability to add to this phenomenon. However, I find that saying, “TV and Video games lead to uncreative and lazy children,” is like saying, “Guns kill people.” I don’t believe that the gun, itself, is going to go on a murderous rampage, nor do I believe that TV or video games, by themselves, are going to make children fat and lazy. Guns require someone to become weapons of death just like TV and video games require someone to become fat and lazy.

However, you can’t blame the individual nor can you blame the parent if a person is more interested in watching whatever is on or playing video games. That is almost entirely unacceptable in our society. To blame someone for actually doing something or not doing something is insane. I mean, we should blame the weapons manufacturers because people, outside of the influence of the manufacturing and distribution process, illegal buy or sell handguns and then use said handguns to go out and shoot people, possibly killing them. Whoever heard of actually taking accountability for ones actions? I know, I know, it’s a foreign ideal.

Let’s pretend for a moment that Television isn’t bad and that handguns, of themselves, don’t kill people. And, for a moment, let’s focus on television.

The TV in most peoples’ homes wasn’t purchased to be a decorative item. Yes, televisions can add to the décor of a home, but the item itself is used for information and for entertainment. I mean that. Televisions serve a purpose in transferring information or to entertain people. There is no other reason to have one if you don’t intend to be entertained or informed. News channels are entertainment venues unless something of great importance is happening, and then they become channels of information. We all watch and stare at the screen waiting for some kind of update. I remember having my televisions (all of them, there were three at the time) all turned into various news channels when 9/11 happened. All day, it seemed for weeks, if I was in the apartment, they remained on, they remained on the grisly and heart-wrenching pictures and videos of the planes crashing into the towers and the towers coming down. I really I can’t stand watching video of the towers coming down. But at the time, the news channels went from entertaining me with information about what was happening in the world to informing me about what was going on with something that had become personally important.

Do you remember that day, that week? We all appreciated the very distinctive manner in with President G.W. Bush handled the national emergency. Now, I believe, a majority of people would gladly oust the man for the way in which he manipulated public sentiment to get into Iraq. And we can’t just leave Iraq because we’ve created a powderkeg of a problem that we really need to see through… or until the independent governments ask us to leave. I’m good with the latter happening.

We also use television for entertainment. In the past I’ve written a couple of entries on what I am watching on TV these days. Right now, I get to find bit-torrent downloads of the shows I want to watch. Which means, I am currently keeping up with the Stargate shows and am thinking of seeing if I can get copies of Eureka; however, TV offers a lot of different options for people from educational entertainment channels like the Discovery network of channels (Discover, Travel, TLC, etc.) to purely entertainment driven channels like HBO and Showtime. You can turn on the TV at any time of the day or night and find yourself enmeshed in a world unlike anything you’ve ever experienced because television, at its core, is used to entertain people – most of the time. You can go on a sex romp through channels dedicated to pornography, or find yourself on a mid-twentieth century adventure through various classic movie channels. With the right equipment and money, you can do almost anything.

Imagine having this box in your house that was only ever used for transfer of information. You’d probably look for excuses not to have it or find other uses for it. An aquarium comes to mind. The nation has actually moved away from informational sources like newspapers preferring, instead, the sexier and easier accessibility of the internet. However, combine the information capabilities with entertainment, bring the movies into your home, add functionality that allows you to enjoy the experience, and the outcome is that people are going to schedule time to be at home to watch weekly serials (television shows), they’re going to go to news channels, they’re going to watch public and open access channels… the television becomes one element to entertainment.

I know that one roommate and I scheduled one night a week to watch Donald Trump (The Donald) fire one more person on his The Apprentice reality show. I like the show. I think it actually offers good advice for those who want to go into business. The key to the show is learning to work with people for a common objective. The kick in the pants with the show is that it is reality television and reality TV requires people who are only interested in their own objectives and goals. The outcome to this is you have a combination of people who know how to work well together and those who are more than likely going to stab you in the back the first chance you get. It’s entertaining, not informative. And yet, you can delve the depths of that kind of show and get useful information (though not from anything The Donald has written… that’s all useless crap).

Television, like so many other things, is bad if you make it bad. You can become obsessed. You can lose sight of what is important. The TV in your home can become this instrument that is so overwhelmingly in charge of your life that you will consider nothing else but what is on and when and how it affects your life. That is bad. That is the bad part of television watching. It is destructive and potentially dangerous and does lead to “couch potatoes” and overweight adults and children.

I remember my mother talking about soap operas once. She said that she was in a store and realized that one of her “soaps” was on and immediately left the cart she was shopping with, grabbed the child or children she had with her, and went home to watch that program. When she’d realized what she’d done, according to her, she stopped watching those shows altogether. It didn’t take some intervention, merely the realization that she was making her life revolve around the television.

Growing up we weren’t allowed to watch TV during certain parts of the day or, early on, on different days of the week. That meant that we, as children, had to find alternative sources of entertainment in order to fill the long (and often boring) hours between waking up and when we were allowed to watch whatever was on. When we were in school, and (theoretically) as long as our homework was done, we were allowed to watch cartoons in the afternoons and then whatever was on into the evening. In the summer it seemed like memory tells me that we weren’t allowed to watch television until after 5 p.m. That was the rule. We tried to break it. Frequently. But that was the rule.

As a result I learned to find other things to do. Sleep was one. But I’ve always required a bit of sleep. However, there are other things that we could do. Spending a lot of my formative years in Texas meant that I got used to the neighborhood, the creek that ran through the neighborhood, the woods and trees, as well as storm drains, and how to get to various locations. Having a bike was freedom because it meant I could go places and do things and I didn’t have to wait for my parents to get around to maybe being able to take me. It also meant that on cold mornings I got to ride that bike to school or walk. That was never fun, but the freedom of being able to do one thing required that I accept the obligation of doing something else.

Even driving a car, as a teenager, allowed me certain freedoms that were coupled with responsibilities. Most of them associated with shuttling brothers and sister to the various places they needed, or wanted, to be. As long as I did that I had the freedom to drive, to go places, to have a “ride” to work (so long as we had an extra car); and my parents had the freedom to do what they wanted to do with their lives.

TV allows us various freedoms. One of them is to be informed, if we want it, about what is happening in the world around us. We can learn from what is on. Another freedom is that we can be entertained. I’ve said this in the past, and I will probably say it again, but I am an entertainment junkie. Many people will read that, look at me, say something like, “I’ve lived with him… he, uhm…” and then trail off because I don’t always make it clear what is entertaining to me and what is not. I do look for new ways to entertain myself. However, TV is only one means of doing that. Movies are only one element. Exploring is another element. You can ride motorcycles, work on automobiles, go hiking, participate in community projects, there are all sorts of things that you can do that is entertaining and gets you out of the house and away from the television.

The thing that gets me is when people take the whole idea of TV to an extreme. Becoming fat and lazy because you’ve got to watch what is on and have to sit there all the time is an extreme. Not having a box in your home is an extreme. I can’t judge either extreme. I’ve known people who have monitors that are hooked up to DVD or VHS players simply so they can have educational shows on for their children fearing what is on broadcast television. Again, I don’t have what it takes to say anything about that. It’s a choice each individual, and family, has to make for themselves. I’m good with that. But to say that everyone who watches TV is a bad person or that all television is bad for you and holds no value is equally wrong. That is a choice you’ve made for yourself. Congratulations. I applaud your ability to make those kinds of choices.

From a religious context we have not been counciled to not have a television or not to watch television. General Conference, twice a year, is broadcast to millions of homes because there are television stations and people with those evil boxes in their homes. You get to hear God’s word from his prophets and apostles and other leaders because TV makes it possible. Instead of having to wait for a print copy of the addresses or an audio recording or a video recording you get to watch it live. When tragedies happen its broadcast right into your home. Think about that. Really think about it. For purely informational purposes the television is an invaluable tool. AND you don’t have to JUST watch information.

In my case I get to see shows like Grey’s Anatomy and Boston Legal and Stargate SG1 and Stargate Atlantis and others. In the fall I get to experience Aaron Sorkin’s Studio 60 on the Sunset Strip which I am excited about as well as many other shows that are currently in hiatus and will start up, again, sometime between September and May of next year. That is entertainment. Entertainment is putting aside my crappy life and taking up something that distracts me for a period of time. As long as it doesn’t get in the way of what I am trying to do (school, work, other things) then it is not a bad thing. It is merely one means of my filling my time with additional distractions. And I am good with that.

There will always be people who become too obsessed with something. And for those people I don’t know if there is a way to suggest or get help. Maybe they have to entirely remove the obsessive element from their lives. Little children don’t have the ability to determine, on their own, how much is too much. They need to be monitored. I am not an advocate of TV as babysitter, nor do I like the idea of the television being the only source of entertainment for children; nor the internet; nor video games. Children need to be pushed out the door and, if necessary, made to find alternative means of entertainment. Books are one source that I’ve enjoyed my entire life. Riding a bike is another one (which reminds me… anyone want to donate to the John Needs a Bike Fund?). Just because someone wants something doesn’t mean they need it or should have it. Just because you may want to watch TV doesn’t mean you should.

, , , , ,

No Comments

Just remembered. This is post

Just remembered. This is post 400. Yay me.

Also, I added some headshots to my photo album. Feel free to check them out and make fun of me. Those comments I will definitely post and approve.

John Hattaway

2 Comments

John Hattaway

Because I find it may be necessary to state who I am: John Hattaway. Think Denny Crane; but instead, John Hattaway. Yup. That’s my name. John Hattaway.

If you are really curious as to why I did this drop me an e-mail: smokingpen@hotmail.com and I will attempt to explain. I will not explain in a messenger app. I will not explain through comments. Only through e-mail. And please note, I recieve enough e-mail that I don’t need to add to the pile; this is merely a hoop I feel like making people jump through.

John Hattaway

p.s. If’n you don’t get the Denny Crane comment, drop me an e-mail and I will explain it to you. See above for restrictions and limitations.

1 Comment

Rejuvenile Idiots

Okay, it’s late and I may sound like a complete hypocrite here, but I was just scanning news headlines at news.Yahoo.com and came across this article. It’s about rejuveniles. Adults who are still living in a semi-juvenile wonderland and who also live their adult lives, pay mortgages, car payments, work jobs, and take their children to little league.

From my title you can already see that I don’t think this is something worth writing a book about (which is what the article was about) or something that should be taken seriously. I think that this is showing a much larger problem in our society and not something that should be looked at and studied for any benefit that might be derived from the habit or attitude. Don’t get me too wrong, I think adults should be able to let loose, have fun, play, interact with their children; but enough is enough is enough. You can’t pretend to still be a child, to dress as a child, to act as a child, and not think that something isn’t going wrong.

You know what, I don’t know what it means to feel like an adult. I am willing to bet that no one really knows what it means to feel like and adult. That is some stupid bull that someone somewhere decided to start spreading around. You get to a certain age, you feel and act a certain way. Great! The moment someone can definitively define for me, so that there is absolutely no confusion, what it means to feel like an adult I will lay weight to my feelings and determine whether or not I am there yet; or whether or not I feel as though I’ve grown up.

We are an obsessive youth culture. Not just in America, but anywhere where the economic ramifications of high paying jobs and disposable income amount to a life where moms and dads can take time off whenever they feel like it to go skateboarding, go to pajama parties, or to do things that are in the realm of “childish.”

There is something about a culture, to me, where adults are encouraged to act like children that makes the whole notion of childhood and adulthood less distinctive and destroys the natural relationships between parents and children. What happens when you child does need someone to talk to about a serious problem. If you have only ever been a child playmate role model you are not going to be that person. When drugs come into question, or alcohol, or any other emotionally damaging thing comes along, you, as an adult, are not going to be the person your children can rely upon for real, solid, and realistic advice or even a real ear just to listen. You’ve relegated yourself to being a playmate which means that other playmates and schoolmates opinions and advice is of equal importance to them as yours. You aren’t serious and that is wrong.

None of this means that you have to be serious all of the time or that you can’t play. But, to paraphrase the bible: When I was a child I acted as I child, I spoke as a child; but when I became an adult I put away childish things. Guess what, that’s not just advice. That is probably the most important thing that you will probably ever hear about being an adult. There is no specific feeling, no handshake, no club, and no initiation. Being an adult is realizing that responsibility is important and that the things you enjoyed as a child, sleepovers, pajama parties, and dodgeball competitions aren’t for you anymore. Yes, you can participate. No, you cannot initiate anymore. Your role, if you’ve become a parent, is to monitor and support not to initiate or participate. You are a child no more.

Mark this, and note how sagacious it will become, those adults who choose to live this lifestyle will suffer deep depression, will lose contact with family and children, and will not be able to maintain their standard of living as a result of this. This will become pandemic as a result of peoples choice to live a life outside of where their roles should be. Childlike is teachable. Childish is not. Rejuveniles are childish.

1 Comment

The DaVinci Code

I went and watched the movie, I’ve listened to an abridgement of the book, I even broke down and bought a copy of the book so I could read it and find out what all the hubbub is about when people get all misty eyed and tongue tied trying to describe the experience that is Dan Brown’s The DaVinci Code. As yet, I have not read the book, I walked out of the movie, and I didn’t suffer, per say, through the audio book. I did really like Dan Brown’s Angels and Demons which I thought was a remarkable book (as I recall) you can read my review here.

With all of that out of the way I spent five or ten minutes reading, very quickly, the Prologue to a book on religious diversity in America. The author, a Christian, wrote to some length about the disparity between the stated norm of the United States and its religious tolerances, and the actual practice of religious tolerance. She used specific examples of violence that were, in part, spawned by the September 11, 2001 attacks against people of other non-Christian faiths, specifically Muslims, and stated that we, as Americans, were tolerant of all religions. I agree.

However, when you deal with a subject matter like what is in The DaVinci Code, which, quite frankly, is all about Christ, and then try to transport that to another nation which is, say, primarily Muslim or Jewish, the translation doesn’t really go very well. The reason for that is because many nations don’t believe, the people, in Christ and therefore Christianity or books about Christianity are somewhat redundant because, well, the people don’t buy it. They don’t get the symbolism of the subject matter, and many couldn’t care less whether or not one Jesus of Nazareth saved mankind by taking upon him everyone’s sins.

So, Iran announced (you can read a news article here) that they would not be allowing The DaVinci Code into their country. It’s a worldwide bestseller. You’re not going to stop it. But people, here, in America and other allegedly democratic nations, are probably outraged at this slight. Iran, a country that, according to Ted Koppel, we are at war with (read the news article here) Iran. He makes a rather convincing argument. We are just too stupid or too blind to realize that that’s what we are doing.

Still, Iran is banning The DaVinci Code. Great. Do it. However, if your nation doesn’t believe in Christ and the majority of people don’t practice Christianity, than, and please help me to understand, why are you banning something that becomes an interesting fable? It doesn’t affect the religious convictions of your people. You’re not like the Catholic church who is directly attacked in this book. You don’t have to worry about parishioners going to the priest or bishop and asking why the Church is keeping the truth about Christ’s progeny a secret.

I find is personally odd that Muslim or Jewish or Hindu or Buddhist countries care one way or another about that book. Believe me, I understand stopping the spreading of the New Testament or specific religious texts. The people decide to mass convert to another religion and you are in trouble. But really, it’s fiction. It’s a nice fable that causes people to ask questions and you’re banning it. Had you banned the movie, I could totally see that. It was one of the worst, hands down, things I’ve seen to date. It scaled up there with Ultraviolet as a really bad movie. But the book. It’s not real. Fiction. Fake. Not true. And yet, you ban it because?

Oh, right, it talks about Christianity and Christianity is the principle thing that Muslim and Jewish nations have to worry about. Heaven forbid someone wake up one morning and realize that maybe, just maybe, there is something better, or just different, out there. Wouldn’t want that to happen.

Anyway, found that to be an odd assertion today. Ban fiction. It’s bad for you. Tomorrow, I write about TV as Entertainment.

No Comments

Eureka on SciFi

Okay, so, there I was doing my thing and I discovered that SciFi.com allows viewers to watch some episodes of some shows. AND on top of that, they’ve premiered their new show Eureka and you can watch it online (provided you have a large bandwidth internet connection).

I like the show. It is funny and well written and, wow. I think the only word I really know for the show is, “wow.” It was good. Really good. Impossibly good. The premise is that Einstein convinced Eisenhower that the United States needed a special top secret community where scientific research and advancements could move forward. Eisenhower agreed, Eureka was born, and the best and brightest minds were transplanted to this little hamlet to set up shop and work on technological advances.

Enter the protagonist, Marshal Jack Carter (played by Colin Ferguson) transporting his daughter (as fugitive) back to Los Angeles and her mother. Their cars goes off the road, they land in a tree, he falls out of car, they wander into Eureka and find the local sheriff who is friendly and somewhat anxious to get them out of town and on their way, quickly, without trying to act like he is anxious to get them out of town and on their way.

Pretty quickly weird things start to happen. A kid is lost. Jack steps in to assist in the investigation. And before he knows it he is armpit deep in the muck and mud of the town as they try to figure out what is translocating people and animals and the back end of a Winnebago. It’s pretty interesting, very X-Files-ish without making the show so weird that you ostracize a large portion of your potential viewing audience. Truth told it is closer to a SciFi dramedy than it is a SciFi drama (ala X-Files) and keeps it’s wits about them as they go from location to location and experiment to experiment trying to uncover what is really going on in Eureka. The military show up. Things get really weird. And then, before you know it, a solution is found, Jack and Zoe (his daughter) are back on the road home and he is “promoted” and sent right back to Eureka.

It was an amazing pilot episode. I have to parrot a comment I read or heard about the show, the SciFi channel had better not only pick this one up, but had better keep it going. The show is so good that you want to follow it, you want to see where it will eventually lead you, you want to come back and watch it again and again because they’ve created a world that, in some strange fashion, really does work.

If you get a chance, I’d suggest watching it.

No Comments

InspectorWordpress has prevented 0 attacks.